Castle Librarian

Archive for January, 2013|Monthly archive page

Neuroscience and Education

In Continuing education on January 26, 2013 at 5:58 pm

I’m participating in an online course related to neuroscience and education. The first week has been spent on the physical structure and function of the brain. This is mostly review for me since I have had a fair amount of coursework and previous reading in this area.

I find understanding the mechanics of what is happening in the ultimate “black box,” the brain, to be very helpful. If I have learned anything from living with a family member who has Attention Deficit Disorder, it is that it is foolish to expect someone to do something that they cannot do.  There is often a fine line, that is hard to find, between what a person can do and what they cannot do. As for what they “cannot” do, it may be a matter of finding another way, a way around the usual path.

Whether a brain is functioning normally or has some impediment (adhd, dyslexia, constant stress, etc.) it is important to remember that not every action is premeditated. The child acting up in class may not have the faintest idea why he/she is acting up. Nor is it something that they can turn on and off with a toggle switch.

Cultural differences also muddy the waters. I am dealing with students who are all members of the same culture. I am the weirdo, if you will, the alien. I struggle to understand what they value and why they value it, because it seems to be the opposite of my value system. Catching their attention and motivating them to participate in their own education is my current challenge.

Advertisements

Where Information Literacy Went Wrong

In Librarianship on January 24, 2013 at 7:25 pm

Over the ages, librarians have taught people how to find information. Until recently, this amounted to teaching people how to find information within the confines of the library. How to use the card catalog to find the location of the needed book on the shelves. How to find magazine and journal articles by subject without paging through each publication. As technology changed, librarians also had to teach people how to use that technology – microfilm, microfiche, audiocassettes, etc. These things were usually taught beginning in elementary school and continuing through to college.

The transition from print to computer resulted in a steep learning curve for everyone. Finding information now required more complex strategies and critical thinking skills. Librarians were on the front lines with the students who were prepared for a card catalog, but facing an Online Public Access Catalog. In trying to help them use the new library to find information, librarians began to see the need for formal instruction and the building of new skills. They dubbed these skills “information literacy.”

Meanwhile, teachers were faced with the learning curve of new technologies, too. As with any group of people, there were early adopters who get on board with new things right away and expend the effort to learn and apply the new tech. Then came the majority who adopt new tech after it has been tested and promoted by the early adopters. These are followed by the laggards who are the last to learn to use the new. Eventually, teachers would have started teaching the new needed skills, but front line librarians didn’t want to wait for the trickle down and let’s face it, computer technology does not wait for people to catch up. Therefore, librarians decided it was their job to teach students these new skills. Now, nearly every librarian job advertisement includes teaching information literacy skills.

There was a crossroads at which librarians had to choose what to do about the student’s need for new skills. What were the options? 1. Help the students at point of need as best as possible. 2. Create a library instruction program to help students work toward the skills in groups. 3. Collaborate with teachers to integrate the skills into K-12-Post-secondary education. 4. Teach the teachers and provide them with the skills that can then be passed on to the students. For the most part, the profession chose Option 2. Option 3 (collaboration) proved too hard because too many teachers were resistent. Too many teachers were put off by the computer technology learning curve. Too many teachers were put off by librarians horning into their business.

It is unfortunate that we didn’t opt for Option 4. We should have aimed our sights at the current teaching staff by offering professional development opportunities and at teacher education programs incorporating information literacy skills in the next generation of teachers. After 20 years of information literacy instruction delivered to students by librarians, we still have students AND teachers who lack those crucial skills. We missed the mark.